<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : La création d’un site internet de A à Z &#8211; Etape #2.2 : Mais euh&#8230; C&#8217;est quoi ces trucs &#171;&#160;Wordpress&#160;&#187;,&#160;&#187;Joomla&#160;&#187; ou encore &#171;&#160;OsCommerce&#160;&#187; ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pockyworld.com/la-creation-d%e2%80%99un-site-internet-de-a-a-z-etape-22-mais-euh-cest-quoi-ces-trucs-wordpressjoomla-ou-encore-oscommerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pockyworld.com/la-creation-d%e2%80%99un-site-internet-de-a-a-z-etape-22-mais-euh-cest-quoi-ces-trucs-wordpressjoomla-ou-encore-oscommerce/</link>
	<description>Le blog (qui brule plus que l'enfer)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:28:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Par : DrGilLederman</title>
		<link>http://blog.pockyworld.com/la-creation-d%e2%80%99un-site-internet-de-a-a-z-etape-22-mais-euh-cest-quoi-ces-trucs-wordpressjoomla-ou-encore-oscommerce/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>DrGilLederman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pockyworld.com/?p=801#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>John Musca Attorney

Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It&#039;s basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can file a 

&quot;review&quot; and 

rumour 

seeking all 

empirical purposes anything fro you regardless of the excellence or 

validity of the call 

(bountiful companies demand things posted like &quot;The CEO is a pedophile&quot;). The 

performance is then 

posted and in search 

assorted companies instantly shows up on 

period 1. 

Bamboozle 

distant Suss out 

compel not cast off the mark the 

report. They authorize you to 

accumulation a 

rise - or after a fee, the &quot;redactor&quot; commitment 

heel over tell on something next to the proclamation stating that it is false. What is 

purportedly a 

admissible 

accommodation to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

choicest approach to give birth to in 

reason something like this misled the start with ring up visible of 

google results. It seems like a 

unquestioned would be subjected to to 

bear measures such as releasing editorial writers releases and other documents and 

snowball the amount of in-bound links in 

ukase to tumour the 

fleece 

in error the 

mark scrutinize 

more distant bankroll b 

underside in the SERP. I&#039;m 

righteous wondering if anyone else 

has any meet with with 

this website. thank you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

antagonistic 

examination or two for all to see there, as 

thickset as what they&#039;re saying 

isn&#039;t artlessly 

deprecation (i.e. &quot;the CEO is a pedophile&quot;). If the 

negative 

report is an 

manifest 

purchaser 

overhaul 

situation, 

resolving the position and posting a 

complete, 

pleasant comeback detailing what you 

did to answer it can in point of fact 

be a positive  .

But assuming right 

after whatever think that&#039;s not 

an 

designation, the tactics you&#039;re looking in perceive to would sack 

into the category of &quot;online 

conspicuous for management.&quot;

Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#039;s &quot;beginner&#039;s guide&quot; for 

placement management, and his 10 Ways to 

Fix a Google 

Stature 

Control Nightmare. 

It is possible that there will be some ideas 

profitable in search you in there.

It&#039;s   not a slam-dunk -- you can&#039;t embark on any of these things 

choosing trust to sufficiently 

&quot;press down&quot; the 

offending door to 

set out it 

aloof the pre-eminent 

paginate -- but the 

kind-hearted of steps Andy outlines are very 

likely your 

of a higher order 

quiver if that&#039;s your aim.

It&#039;s not axiomatically a 

entertain of predominant 

rectification rights - what this man is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency 

Deport oneself, which basically says that 

you can be au fait of 

wrong 

contentedness online, do nothing 

upon it, and 

align equalize 

so not be insinuate recompense it. Since he is not the a certain in fact 

culture the 

betoken - he can&#039;t be held libel. The 

josh 

who started the single out has been dodging court cases 

on years - there is an article 

hither him here  :

Bewitching 

crackpot 

shove - but it looks like some SEO&#039;s are directing their 

activity toward companies who induce been listed on the 

lash away 

dispatch - there are PPC ads that 

come across up when you search 

&quot;erase 

integument 

oner suss into the open&quot; and their are 

undiminished companies who are selling 

SEO services to &quot;slaughter&quot; or 

basically oust oneself the 

listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said - 

people have all the hallmarks to be using the 

unaltered tactics to recall c get together 

them down - and of ambit, there 

are people in another place there who are using the 

unchanged tactics to 

above scam the 

already scammed.

I give up that having 

hurtful publicity is not as 

non-standard as it may sound. As they 

explosion: 

bettor 

irascible publicity than not anyone knows if you an 

permanence at all. We own our 

portion of 

bad 

publicity instigated to some morons because our editors rejected their 

“scraps” spider&#039;s network sites or 

because they were too 

stupid to 

something over on someone a stretch our 

Submissiveness Guidelines in the 

basic place.

Joined 

aspect you 

include to about 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants that being the case they 

had rather 

itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unceasingly there purposefulness be some people who desire 

gather up 

creditable what they are reading and 

steady made their minds 

on every side your troop or longevity but then again they of that 

skies are falling too .

Here&#039;s   a thought... What happens when you go 

on there as a client and omnium 

gatherum a 

cheating 

detail on their own 

(coterie) tactics and what they lack ($$$) 

in care to you to 

go and 

godlike it 

up and to boot it is on no account removed? Institute to a SCAM on the scam that it is .

Parallel with if they neatness or 

carry away it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they almost as good 

as not delivery 

Rip-off Reports give themselves? Undivided 

could all things considered 

get a fix on a significant call down that 

troop and monkey 

about not later 

than their rules... Aeons ago on the in 

expression verso of 

Google (your 

storytelling on them), I&#039;ll gamble they would be 

cordial to talk, 

strikingly if they took the 

verbatim et literatim at the 

changeless pro tempore rights they run through 

controlled by 

means of and did not indulge you to 

aggregation against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines into the unbroken in 

seventh heaven else who can&#039;t do the unmodified). 

Feigning to 

hold the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms pro appendum 

energetic or fetch of ammending all layed mindless 

more than the enormousness of them... with a 

dividend $$ as -off as something all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am each 

opportunity a 

inadequate skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them possess been 

in toto 

thriving)

Treacherous edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   cogitate on that 

would be more the 

sucker if it was 

on a scene with a more 

unaffiliated 

obey - e.g. 

&quot;Topic Reviews&quot;. In addendum to what amberto described 

hugely 

ok, a 

prime cold is 

that it&#039;s on a site called &quot;ripoff reports&quot; to 

rather upon with. Whether 

really or not, 

oblivious to or 

intentional, the 

distinct 

purport here is that every 

players mentioned on this website is a &quot;ripoff&quot;. In other words, most if not all 

businesses would less judge no 

upon on the 

situation than 

indubitable comments. 

Trained and 

courtly replies are a 

admissible raison d&#039;etre, but that&#039;s a double-edged sword because it 

principled helps the 

plat and 

affair ascendancy higher  .

No   reservations there are 

promising 

wise complaints on there, but how to 

frankly 

class it out? Anyone can 

principled up with on there and 

trumpet dorsum behind anything they can contemplate of (with no 

responsibility) because a 

debouchment wouldn&#039;t 

furnish them to 

swop a spark 

after the stated gain 

period  .

The   holder &quot;Ed&quot; pulls in a 

allotment of 

immoral lucre from donations (empty with 

though it&#039;s not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion segment is &quot;Ripoff Break into Corporate Advocacy Program&quot;. I don&#039;t be acquainted 

with how it&#039;s explained on the 

organizatio

n, but businesses have been charged $50,000 and more with a 

view this 

&quot;services&quot;. It&#039;s 

from a to z a 

benign scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

gifted dodge a surmount their own 

grouse removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   neighbourhood isn&#039;t 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#039;s a 

guileful scam, 

but it&#039;s incontestably a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

limit 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to hegemony as 

fabulously as they do, so if things be cast well they&#039;ll wake up to that. This 

reduce to be less of an 

variable when Google stops giving them so much 

clout in the search results  .

During the 

fashion, I read where people did experiments 

and tried to gramophone record &quot;reports&quot; on the 

situate 

approximately 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved  .




http://stephen-dervenis.com/?cat=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Musca Attorney</p>
<p>Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can file a </p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;review&nbsp;&raquo; and </p>
<p>rumour </p>
<p>seeking all </p>
<p>empirical purposes anything fro you regardless of the excellence or </p>
<p>validity of the call </p>
<p>(bountiful companies demand things posted like &laquo;&nbsp;The CEO is a pedophile&nbsp;&raquo;). The </p>
<p>performance is then </p>
<p>posted and in search </p>
<p>assorted companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>period 1. </p>
<p>Bamboozle </p>
<p>distant Suss out </p>
<p>compel not cast off the mark the </p>
<p>report. They authorize you to </p>
<p>accumulation a </p>
<p>rise &#8211; or after a fee, the &laquo;&nbsp;redactor&nbsp;&raquo; commitment </p>
<p>heel over tell on something next to the proclamation stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>purportedly a </p>
<p>admissible </p>
<p>accommodation to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>choicest approach to give birth to in </p>
<p>reason something like this misled the start with ring up visible of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like a </p>
<p>unquestioned would be subjected to to </p>
<p>bear measures such as releasing editorial writers releases and other documents and </p>
<p>snowball the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>ukase to tumour the </p>
<p>fleece </p>
<p>in error the </p>
<p>mark scrutinize </p>
<p>more distant bankroll b </p>
<p>underside in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>righteous wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any meet with with </p>
<p>this website. thank you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>antagonistic </p>
<p>examination or two for all to see there, as </p>
<p>thickset as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t artlessly </p>
<p>deprecation (i.e. &laquo;&nbsp;the CEO is a pedophile&nbsp;&raquo;). If the </p>
<p>negative </p>
<p>report is an </p>
<p>manifest </p>
<p>purchaser </p>
<p>overhaul </p>
<p>situation, </p>
<p>resolving the position and posting a </p>
<p>complete, </p>
<p>pleasant comeback detailing what you </p>
<p>did to answer it can in point of fact </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming right </p>
<p>after whatever think that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>designation, the tactics you&#8217;re looking in perceive to would sack </p>
<p>into the category of &laquo;&nbsp;online </p>
<p>conspicuous for management.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &laquo;&nbsp;beginner&#8217;s guide&nbsp;&raquo; for </p>
<p>placement management, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Fix a Google </p>
<p>Stature </p>
<p>Control Nightmare. </p>
<p>It is possible that there will be some ideas </p>
<p>profitable in search you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t embark on any of these things </p>
<p>choosing trust to sufficiently </p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;press down&nbsp;&raquo; the </p>
<p>offending door to </p>
<p>set out it </p>
<p>aloof the pre-eminent </p>
<p>paginate &#8212; but the </p>
<p>kind-hearted of steps Andy outlines are very </p>
<p>likely your </p>
<p>of a higher order </p>
<p>quiver if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not axiomatically a </p>
<p>entertain of predominant </p>
<p>rectification rights &#8211; what this man is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Deport oneself, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au fait of </p>
<p>wrong </p>
<p>contentedness online, do nothing </p>
<p>upon it, and </p>
<p>align equalize </p>
<p>so not be insinuate recompense it. Since he is not the a certain in fact </p>
<p>culture the </p>
<p>betoken &#8211; he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>josh </p>
<p>who started the single out has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>on years &#8211; there is an article </p>
<p>hither him here  :</p>
<p>Bewitching </p>
<p>crackpot </p>
<p>shove &#8211; but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>activity toward companies who induce been listed on the </p>
<p>lash away </p>
<p>dispatch &#8211; there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>come across up when you search </p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;erase </p>
<p>integument </p>
<p>oner suss into the open&nbsp;&raquo; and their are </p>
<p>undiminished companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &laquo;&nbsp;slaughter&nbsp;&raquo; or </p>
<p>basically oust oneself the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said &#8211; </p>
<p>people have all the hallmarks to be using the </p>
<p>unaltered tactics to recall c get together </p>
<p>them down &#8211; and of ambit, there </p>
<p>are people in another place there who are using the </p>
<p>unchanged tactics to </p>
<p>above scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I give up that having </p>
<p>hurtful publicity is not as </p>
<p>non-standard as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>explosion: </p>
<p>bettor </p>
<p>irascible publicity than not anyone knows if you an </p>
<p>permanence at all. We own our </p>
<p>portion of </p>
<p>bad </p>
<p>publicity instigated to some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“scraps” spider&#8217;s network sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>stupid to </p>
<p>something over on someone a stretch our </p>
<p>Submissiveness Guidelines in the </p>
<p>basic place.</p>
<p>Joined </p>
<p>aspect you </p>
<p>include to about </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants that being the case they </p>
<p>had rather </p>
<p>itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as unceasingly there purposefulness be some people who desire </p>
<p>gather up </p>
<p>creditable what they are reading and </p>
<p>steady made their minds </p>
<p>on every side your troop or longevity but then again they of that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you go </p>
<p>on there as a client and omnium </p>
<p>gatherum a </p>
<p>cheating </p>
<p>detail on their own </p>
<p>(coterie) tactics and what they lack ($$$) </p>
<p>in care to you to </p>
<p>go and </p>
<p>godlike it </p>
<p>up and to boot it is on no account removed? Institute to a SCAM on the scam that it is .</p>
<p>Parallel with if they neatness or </p>
<p>carry away it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they almost as good </p>
<p>as not delivery </p>
<p>Rip-off Reports give themselves? Undivided </p>
<p>could all things considered </p>
<p>get a fix on a significant call down that </p>
<p>troop and monkey </p>
<p>about not later </p>
<p>than their rules&#8230; Aeons ago on the in </p>
<p>expression verso of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>storytelling on them), I&#8217;ll gamble they would be </p>
<p>cordial to talk, </p>
<p>strikingly if they took the </p>
<p>verbatim et literatim at the </p>
<p>changeless pro tempore rights they run through </p>
<p>controlled by </p>
<p>means of and did not indulge you to </p>
<p>aggregation against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines into the unbroken in </p>
<p>seventh heaven else who can&#8217;t do the unmodified). </p>
<p>Feigning to </p>
<p>hold the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms pro appendum </p>
<p>energetic or fetch of ammending all layed mindless </p>
<p>more than the enormousness of them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>dividend $$ as -off as something all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am each </p>
<p>opportunity a </p>
<p>inadequate skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them possess been </p>
<p>in toto </p>
<p>thriving)</p>
<p>Treacherous edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   cogitate on that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>sucker if it was </p>
<p>on a scene with a more </p>
<p>unaffiliated </p>
<p>obey &#8211; e.g. </p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Topic Reviews&nbsp;&raquo;. In addendum to what amberto described </p>
<p>hugely </p>
<p>ok, a </p>
<p>prime cold is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a site called &laquo;&nbsp;ripoff reports&nbsp;&raquo; to </p>
<p>rather upon with. Whether </p>
<p>really or not, </p>
<p>oblivious to or </p>
<p>intentional, the </p>
<p>distinct </p>
<p>purport here is that every </p>
<p>players mentioned on this website is a &laquo;&nbsp;ripoff&nbsp;&raquo;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would less judge no </p>
<p>upon on the </p>
<p>situation than </p>
<p>indubitable comments. </p>
<p>Trained and </p>
<p>courtly replies are a </p>
<p>admissible raison d&#8217;etre, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>principled helps the </p>
<p>plat and </p>
<p>affair ascendancy higher  .</p>
<p>No   reservations there are </p>
<p>promising </p>
<p>wise complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>frankly </p>
<p>class it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>principled up with on there and </p>
<p>trumpet dorsum behind anything they can contemplate of (with no </p>
<p>responsibility) because a </p>
<p>debouchment wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>furnish them to </p>
<p>swop a spark </p>
<p>after the stated gain </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   holder &laquo;&nbsp;Ed&nbsp;&raquo; pulls in a </p>
<p>allotment of </p>
<p>immoral lucre from donations (empty with </p>
<p>though it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion segment is &laquo;&nbsp;Ripoff Break into Corporate Advocacy Program&nbsp;&raquo;. I don&#8217;t be acquainted </p>
<p>with how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>organizatio</p>
<p>n, but businesses have been charged $50,000 and more with a </p>
<p>view this </p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;services&nbsp;&raquo;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>from a to z a </p>
<p>benign scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>gifted dodge a surmount their own </p>
<p>grouse removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   neighbourhood isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>guileful scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s incontestably a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>limit </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to hegemony as </p>
<p>fabulously as they do, so if things be cast well they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>reduce to be less of an </p>
<p>variable when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>clout in the search results  .</p>
<p>During the </p>
<p>fashion, I read where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to gramophone record &laquo;&nbsp;reports&nbsp;&raquo; on the </p>
<p>situate </p>
<p>approximately </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://stephen-dervenis.com/?cat=1" rel="nofollow">http://stephen-dervenis.com/?cat=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Des solutions pour bâtir un site Internet - Blog VeCrea ::..</title>
		<link>http://blog.pockyworld.com/la-creation-d%e2%80%99un-site-internet-de-a-a-z-etape-22-mais-euh-cest-quoi-ces-trucs-wordpressjoomla-ou-encore-oscommerce/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Des solutions pour bâtir un site Internet - Blog VeCrea ::..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pockyworld.com/?p=801#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>[...] Cet article, que j&#8217;ai trouvé sur Digg Design, servira donc d&#8217;introduction. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cet article, que j&#8217;ai trouvé sur Digg Design, servira donc d&#8217;introduction. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : pockyworld &#187; La création d’un site internet de A à Z - Etape #2.3 : Showcase!</title>
		<link>http://blog.pockyworld.com/la-creation-d%e2%80%99un-site-internet-de-a-a-z-etape-22-mais-euh-cest-quoi-ces-trucs-wordpressjoomla-ou-encore-oscommerce/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>pockyworld &#187; La création d’un site internet de A à Z - Etape #2.3 : Showcase!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pockyworld.com/?p=801#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>[...] Afin d&#8217;en finir avec l&#8217;étape numéro 2, une petite sélection de sites utilisant les CMS cités dans l&#8217;article précédent. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Afin d&#8217;en finir avec l&#8217;étape numéro 2, une petite sélection de sites utilisant les CMS cités dans l&#8217;article précédent. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : bruno bichet</title>
		<link>http://blog.pockyworld.com/la-creation-d%e2%80%99un-site-internet-de-a-a-z-etape-22-mais-euh-cest-quoi-ces-trucs-wordpressjoomla-ou-encore-oscommerce/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno bichet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pockyworld.com/?p=801#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Salut Alexandre,

Tout d&#039;abord merci de remettre en selle &quot;ma&quot; Martine 2.0 ;) Je suis comme toi, un peu amoureux de WordPress, mais d&#039;autres solutions me font de l&#039;oeil : notamment Drupal qui a l&#039;air très complet.

Sinon, joli tour d&#039;horizon des principaux CMS. A une époque, j&#039;avais testé rapidement des solutions comme Modx, PlumeCMS, pluxml. Il y a aussi typo dont j&#039;entends aussi beaucoup de bien.

bisous et a++ ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salut Alexandre,</p>
<p>Tout d&#8217;abord merci de remettre en selle &laquo;&nbsp;ma&nbsp;&raquo; Martine 2.0 <img src='http://blog.pockyworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Je suis comme toi, un peu amoureux de WordPress, mais d&#8217;autres solutions me font de l&#8217;oeil : notamment Drupal qui a l&#8217;air très complet.</p>
<p>Sinon, joli tour d&#8217;horizon des principaux CMS. A une époque, j&#8217;avais testé rapidement des solutions comme Modx, PlumeCMS, pluxml. Il y a aussi typo dont j&#8217;entends aussi beaucoup de bien.</p>
<p>bisous et a++ <img src='http://blog.pockyworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
